Bearhawk Aircraft Bearhawk Tailwheels LLC Eric Newton's Builder Manuals Bearhawk Plans Bearhawk Store

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stabiliser L/E rock damage - photo

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stabiliser L/E rock damage - photo

    After a bunch off tricky off airport landings, I noticed we picked up some more significant damage than usual. I thought I would share it.

    I am guessing that it happened because of higher landing speeds due to very light tailwinds, combined with a tail-low attitude as I try to minimise airspeed at touchdown, resulting in a bigger grade of rock making it high enough to contact the stabiliser. We had no choice on the tailwind, as we visited a number of short one-way spots (about 300ft long), which actually pushed the machine right to the limits of landing performance due to the tailwind component.

    As you can see, the stone has noticeably dented the 4130 steel, as well as cutting the fabric. I am guessing the stone was probably about the size of a ping-pong ball.


    It was an interesting day's flying. I found a couple of situations where the Bearhawk's fantastic power to weight ratio left me with a less-than-ideal margin of safety during take-off. I think is was mostly shifty winds and a soft draggy surface which caused the take-off roll to lengthen. I am certain I learned a few valuable lessons that day, which are going to stick with me, like the dent in the stabiliser. Getting close to the limits of performance without much margin for error is a pretty uncomfortable, when you're flying a plane you've poured a couple of thousand hours work into!

    On the positive side, I feel like I have finally started to reach a level of competence where I can land about as short as I can take-off, given certain environments with a light-to-moderate load on board (I have the heavy -540 engine). Lately I am thinking 260hp is exactly the right amount of power for the backcountry Either that, or I've sucked some river sands into the engine and lost a bunch of power!

  • #2
    For the experts out there, is there criteria for how much damage you can have before you have to replace / splice the 4130 tube, versus just making the fabric repair?

    I'm saying this one looks particularly bad - just made me start thinking about it and realizing I have no idea where to draw the line.
    Jim Parker
    Farmersville, TX (NE of Dallas)
    RANS S-6ES (E-LSA) with Rotax 912ULS (100 HP)

    Comment


    • #3
      The FAA provides guidance for what they expect to have done on TC airplanes. Find it here and scroll down to page 67. Page 75 includes this:
      4-100. BUILT-UP TUBULAR WING OR TAIL-SPARS. Repair built-up tubular wing or tail-spars by using any of the applicable splices and methods of repair shown in figure 4-35 through figure 4-45, provided the spars are not heat treated. Figure 4-35 starts around page 67.
      Bob would probably be the best person to ask about what kind of repair would be necessary to maintain structural integrity, since we aren't necessarily bound to 43.13 with EAB airplanes.

      Comment


      • #4
        Well I asked Bob about this when we talked this morning. He said the tube damage needed to be inspected well (10X magnifying glass) to see if it is just a dent on the forward surface (best) or the damage includes a crack in the tube (not so good). Because the forces when flying on this part are really up and down (not forward and aft), a ding on the leading edge shouldn't be a big problem if the tube itself is still intact with no holes or cracks. If the tube is OK, some JB weld and a fabric patch will do the job. If the tube is cracked or has a hole - then a splice of fresh tubing would be needed. Mark

        Comment

        Working...
        X