Is am not sure how well it will work to reduce adverse yaw. It should help some. Are there any options to adjust the gains or aggressiveness of the yaw damping function?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Thinking about a Third Autopilot Servo
Collapse
X
-
Isn’t a yaw damper there just to prevent tail wag during cruise? Never thought about it as an adverse flaw fixer upper. But I’ve not seriously flown behind an autopilot, either. I did make funny faces once, though.Christopher Owens
Bearhawk 4-Place Scratch Built, Plans 991
Bearhawk Patrol Scratch Built, Plans P313
Germantown, Wisconsin, USA
Comment
-
That is it's primary function, but yaw is yaw, and adverse yaw should be reduced as well I would think. The inertial reference senses it, but it doesn't know where it came from. Every aircraft design is different, with different yaw characteristics. Hopefully there is some adjustability to the response of the yaw function.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Thanks again google.
Hello, We are pleased to announce that we are now shipping the RV-10 yaw damper option for RV-10 aircraft equipped with either G3X or G3X Touch systems. The RV-10 yaw damper is a ground up, new design created specifically for the RV-10. The yaw damper servo bracket ties in nicely to the aft...
Comment
-
John, I'm flying the G3X touch system with the 307 A\P controller. I elected to forgo the 3rd axis (yaw damper), but could easily add it at any time. Your question about adjustability is a good one. The installation manual, for the G3X system is around 860 pages. It's available from the Garmin site. And no, you don't need to read and implement everything on all those pages. There's just a lot of information about every aspect of installation and getting the system ready for flight. I'll admit that it was intimidating at first. I learned to really appreciate the detail and depth of information. The section about autopilot configuration is about 60 pages. Again, you don't HAVE to spend untold hours on the minutiae of the system. You can, however, adjust torque - response speed - and sensitivity of each axis, independently of the others. So, to answer your question, yes, the Garmin system can be tailored to your liking. I'm quite certain that the other manufacturers systems would be similarly adjustable, but that's just a hunch.
Bill
Comment
-
I read on VAF that some RV-10 guys will turn on the yaw axis autopilot function shortly after takeoff, and leave it on until right before landing. Feet on the floor the whole flight. Maybe I don't have to relearn how to fly a light aircraft after all? :<)
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Neat idea! I'm using a modified Cessna rudder pedal assembly. My rudder cables are in the center like your rudder trim system. I've created a tensioner to keep the cables under tension... your trim system would eliminate and be better than my set up. One suggestion on your rudder trim... raise one pulley on the firewall and cross the chain/springs. That'll cause the nose to move the same direction as the trim wheel rotation.
Comment
-
Finishing up the last fuselage details before sandblasting and painting. I've read through this thread a couple times, Decided I'm going to make a provision for a yaw dampener in my G3X system, hopefully I won't need it. Using 4 pulleys I will route 3/32" cable forward then up high enough to clear the brake pedals then across behind the firewall to close the rudder loop. I have just enough room for the pulleys because I mounted my rudder pedals an 1" behind plans location. So all I need to install now is 4 pulley brackets and tabs to mount the servo, which would be the capstan style. Will loop the can bus wiring in that location for a future connection if needed. If I don't end up needing a yaw dampener will make a good start on a rudder trim system.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
For just yaw damping due to adverse yaw, wouldn't a strake perform the same function without the complexity? Of course adding a strake after completing the fuselage covering would be difficult. The question is how long and tall would it need to be to reduce the yaw without affecting other flight characteristics.Scott Ahrens
Bearhawk Patrol Plans Built
#254
Comment
-
Originally posted by BravoGolf View PostFor just yaw damping due to adverse yaw, wouldn't a strake perform the same function without the complexity? Of course adding a strake after completing the fuselage covering would be difficult. The question is how long and tall would it need to be to reduce the yaw without affecting other flight characteristics.
Comment
-
Interesting thread. If my memory serves correctly a yaw damper is normally associated with sweep wing aircraft to dampen the lateral effects of Dutch roll. Usually in light aircraft this shouldn’t be an issue.
But adverse yaw is very common and (from memory) is caused by the down going aileron causing a higher angle of attack, more drag, and yawing the aircraft away from the direction of turn. This is often compensated very effectively with differential ailerons by reducing the travel of the down going aileron such that the drag is reduced to match that of the upgoing aileron. Some even had a rudder/aileron cross tie (which were next to useless).
I don’t have the practical experience on a Bearhawk. However I would imagine that balancing the controls first might help a lot before needing to add servos.Last edited by Nev; 08-31-2018, 02:43 AM.Nev Bailey
Christchurch, NZ
BearhawkBlog.com - Safety & Maintenance Notes
YouTube - Build and flying channel
Builders Log - We build planes
Comment
Comment