Originally posted by Nev
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Yaw stability
Collapse
X
-
My guess would be that the planes wouldn't be much different although there is a possibility that mine might have additional cowling area due to the prop spacer supplied by Hartzell. Any increase in cowling area being forward of the CG will counter yaw stability.This was something I didn't know about until well after the aircraft was completed. But yaw comments seem to be common on the forum so I guess it's prevalent, particularly amongst those of us relatively new to tail wheels and older type designs.
I've become used to mine now (200+ hours and 900+ landings), but it took a while, and I'd still prefer to have a small increase in yaw stability. It would also help adverse yaw. The main problem is the effect that flying with the ball not centred has on the fuel system, particularly when operating with a lower fuel quantity. When the ball is not centred, the sight gauges will often indicate more fuel in one tank when actually that tank has the same (or less) fuel, but simply has more fuel against the sight gauge. Obviously this can have serious consequences if one is not aware of the cause.Nev Bailey
Christchurch, NZ
BearhawkBlog.com - Safety & Maintenance Notes
YouTube - Build and flying channel
Builders Log - We build planes
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nev View Postparticularly amongst those of us relatively new to tail wheels and older type designs.
I've become used to mine now (200+ hours and 900+ landings)
The main problem is the effect that flying with the ball not centred has on the fuel system, particularly when operating with a lower fuel quantity. When the ball is not centred, the sight gauges will often indicate more fuel in one tank when actually that tank has the same (or less) fuel, but simply has more fuel against the sight gauge. Obviously this can have serious consequences if one is not aware of the cause.
I've read of some people putting restrictors in their sight tubes with very small holes. This won't help if there is a systematic slip, but I would think could help quite a bit with the turbulence problem.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by kestrel View Post
I've read of some people putting restrictors in their sight tubes with very small holes. This won't help if there is a systematic slip, but I would think could help quite a bit with the turbulence problem.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Interesting thread.
Nev and I flew a 4A together before our kits were completed. He nearly made me sick (I kid you not). Sitting in the back was fun for a few minutes ?.
Nev is a very accomplished and experienced aviator, but from a very different background to me.
I think Kestrel has hit the nail on the head. If you’re used to aircraft that require foot input then you will go huh and adapt to the Bearhawk quickly. If you’re from a yaw dampened background then it might be a little while longer before you go huh and adapt.
One of the things that I didn’t enjoy in the Maule M5 was the lack of rudder authority. The Bearhawk has plenty.
Personally, I think once you’ve adapted you’ll appreciate the control authority for X wind landings atc.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Grant's comments are correct from what I have seen over the years. On a slightly different subject - adverse yaw - the perception of the pilot was 100% based on their flying experience. A pilot who did not have to use his feet much previously often felt the adverse yaw was difficult to get used to. A pilot who came out of an Aeronca, Stinson, or PA18 says "what adverse yaw?" Mark
-
My primary training and first solo (on my 16th) was in a 65 hp J-3. My evaluation of the Bearhawk is that it has a lot of adverse yaw, but... meh... That's what the rudder is for. When I bought my Bearhawk, I flew it about 0.5 hrs and did one landing with the seller. The next morning I climbed into it and flew it from FL to NH in one day. I didn't once notice or think about the adverse yaw. At that time nearly all of my recent experience had been in a C-172 and an RV-4. My life experiences give me one perspective on it. Others have different experiences and preferences and thus, different perspectives.
-
I’m loving this conversation. Now 30 hours into my Bearhawk training I’m finding myself pretty comfortable. Having a bit of time in stubby tailwheel planes (Pacer, Maule) helped. The adverse yaw to me seems a bit more than the Citabria I have flown and am most used to and so was pretty easy to get used to. But, initially, while on skis, the yaw stability was downright confounding. It’s better on wheels but still the least stable plane with the most authoritative rudder that I’ve flown.
-
Originally posted by Nev View PostMy guess would be that the planes wouldn't be much different although there is a possibility that mine might have additional cowling area due to the prop spacer supplied by Hartzell. Any increase in cowling area being forward of the CG will counter yaw stability. This was something I didn't know about until well after the aircraft was completed. But yaw comments seem to be common on the forum so I guess it's prevalent, particularly amongst those of us relatively new to tail wheels and older type designs.
I've become used to mine now (200+ hours and 900+ landings), but it took a while, and I'd still prefer to have a small increase in yaw stability. It would also help adverse yaw. The main problem is the effect that flying with the ball not centred has on the fuel system, particularly when operating with a lower fuel quantity. When the ball is not centred, the sight gauges will often indicate more fuel in one tank when actually that tank has the same (or less) fuel, but simply has more fuel against the sight gauge. Obviously this can have serious consequences if one is not aware of the cause.
The facts were that ZK-RJE is a Model B 4Place with an IO540 engine. We had about 15litres (4 galls) in each tank. We were on Left tank only. We had completed a handful of circuits and I was struggling to keep the aircraft in balance having only flown tri-cycle Cessnas previously. We intended a couple more circuits before filling up. Back in the hangar the engine ran sweetly and no problems were discovered with fuel flow, pumps, air intakes, electrics or anything else.
Learnings for me:- Flying in balance is absolutely essential, especially when fuel levels are low.
- For ZK-RJE flying on BOTH is preferable to allow fuel flow from either tank, especially when low on fuel.
- Keep that ball in the centre.
Never had a problem since.
- Likes 3
Comment
Comment