Having a bit of a debate here regarding how to orient the aluminum bulkhead/former that is attached at the station B crossbar (BH 4-place.) The assembly manual makes it very clear that the piece should be oriented aft of the crossbar, underneath the horizontal tabs, with the top flange pointed aft and the bottom flange pointed forward (page 40 photo.)The aft end of the stainless steel tunnel then is fastened to the bottom of the bulkhead and the length is perfect. The manual then mentions that if your kit has the vertical tabs, you should use those for fastening the bulkhead. The only problem is, the tabs are on the front side of the crossbar for this to be an easy swap.
So, we're seeing 2 methods here. I asked this question of Mark Goldberg and he said that if I had the vertical tabs, to use them, as it's a somewhat preferred way of attaching the bulkhead. However, this requires moving the bulkhead forward about 1", which presents a new problem: The side flanges on the bulkhead and the SS tunnel no longer mate together nicely. There is about a 1/4" gap due to the side profile of the tunnel increasing in height.
I had already drilled the tunnel and bulkhead by the time I asked Mark this question, but it would be easy enough to redrill and trim the extra length off the tunnel (even though working with stainless is arduous.)
Here's how I had it originally:
Here's how I could redo it to use the vertical tabs:
Tabs are on the backside of the piece. Don't be disoriented by the AN3 bulkhead fittings.. I didn't bother to flip them around when I flipped the piece.
The new gap on the tunnel flange-- forcing it together doesn't do much to close it up.
Method 1 (aft of crossbar) pros: I already drilled it. It allows nutplates to be installed in top flange to receive floorboard screws. Profile of tunnel matches nicely with no gap. No trimming of stainless.
Method 1 cons: There's really nothing holding it to the airframe except the floorboard screws.
Method 2 (forward of crossbar) pros: More solid as it's fastened to the vertical tabs on the fuselage. Bulkhead not involved with floorboard fasteners.
Method 2 cons: By moving forward on the tunnel, a gap is opened such that the side flanges don't mate well. Trimming of stainless is a pain. Redrilling.
I don't mind redoing work though, so not really a con. Just wanted to use the best practice. Thanks!
So, we're seeing 2 methods here. I asked this question of Mark Goldberg and he said that if I had the vertical tabs, to use them, as it's a somewhat preferred way of attaching the bulkhead. However, this requires moving the bulkhead forward about 1", which presents a new problem: The side flanges on the bulkhead and the SS tunnel no longer mate together nicely. There is about a 1/4" gap due to the side profile of the tunnel increasing in height.
I had already drilled the tunnel and bulkhead by the time I asked Mark this question, but it would be easy enough to redrill and trim the extra length off the tunnel (even though working with stainless is arduous.)
Here's how I had it originally:
Here's how I could redo it to use the vertical tabs:
Tabs are on the backside of the piece. Don't be disoriented by the AN3 bulkhead fittings.. I didn't bother to flip them around when I flipped the piece.
The new gap on the tunnel flange-- forcing it together doesn't do much to close it up.
Method 1 (aft of crossbar) pros: I already drilled it. It allows nutplates to be installed in top flange to receive floorboard screws. Profile of tunnel matches nicely with no gap. No trimming of stainless.
Method 1 cons: There's really nothing holding it to the airframe except the floorboard screws.
Method 2 (forward of crossbar) pros: More solid as it's fastened to the vertical tabs on the fuselage. Bulkhead not involved with floorboard fasteners.
Method 2 cons: By moving forward on the tunnel, a gap is opened such that the side flanges don't mate well. Trimming of stainless is a pain. Redrilling.
I don't mind redoing work though, so not really a con. Just wanted to use the best practice. Thanks!
Comment