Airline to GA flying after 25 years

[TJ_Slice]

As an airline guy who has not logged time in anything with a propeller in over 25 years, I realize I am at the highest risk level to get back into general aviation, especially in a taildragger. There almost seems to be a universal myth by old airline guys that getting back into GA will be quick and easy. I think over-confidence is the root of the issue when airline guys bend GA metal.

I am under no such illusion, and have budgeted a significant amount to getting re-current and taildragger qualified.

First and foremost will be C172 or similar until I can fly that to at least the same standard as I used to be able to. I plan to start that flying within the next year and will continue until my airplane is ready to fly, which will be at least another 18 months, probably more.

Approaching completion, The plan is to get at least 25 or 30 hours of tailwheel time in at least 3 different airplanes: Citabria, Maul, and 180/185. The last two will involve having to travel a significant distance for at least 4 or 5 days on a couple of occasions.

Finally, I plan to get some Bearhawk time before I fly my own plane. It might be overkill, but I have a lot to un-learn and re-learn.

I would love some input on the process, recommendations on where to train, and stories from anyone who has been through the process.

[rodsmith]

Sounds like a good plan, most important is your realization that GA and especially taildraggers are quite different from what you flew during your career. My one suggestion would be to skip the Cessna 180/185 training and get more hours in the Maule, preferably one with the big engine. The Maule gear is very similar to the Bearhawk, the Cessna spring gear definitely has a different feel in landing. As a former Maule pilot I can tell you it is very similar to the Bearhawk, just not as good. I think the Citabria is great for initial tailwheel training.

[TJ_Slice]

Thanks, that's very helpful

[whee]

Sounds like a solid plan and a whole lot of fun! I do agree with Rod; skip the 180/185 training, it won’t bring much value when compared to Maule time. Also, consider looking for an instructor with a Luscombe. A Luscombe handles very similar to a BH on the ground and in the air.

[TJ_Slice]

Thanks, I'll go for more Maule time then.

[Nev]

That all sounds like a very good plan. I went down the same road a few years ago - it's a ton of fun, and you're already approaching it with a good mindset. Getting tailwheel time, and specifically Bearhawk time before flying your own is priceless. Decades of flying with yaw-dampers tend to make you numb from the waist down.

[svyolo]

Mine was 42 years. I won't suggest being humble, as you already are. You are on the correct path.