When connecting a short rubber hose between the sight gauge fittings and the 1/4” aluminum tubing coming from the tanks, I think I need a beaded lip or slight flair on the 1/4” tubing to help secure the rubber hose. I haven’t found a cheap beading tool that small. I’m thinking maybe a slight flair might work. What have you guys done here that works? Thanks
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
sight gauge connection
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sierra Skydog View PostWhen connecting a short rubber hose between the sight gauge fittings and the 1/4” aluminum tubing coming from the tanks, I think I need a beaded lip or slight flair on the 1/4” tubing to help secure the rubber hose. I haven’t found a cheap beading tool that small. I’m thinking maybe a slight flair might work. What have you guys done here that works? Thanks
-
I did not use any rubber lines in the fuel system between the tanks and the firewall. I didn't trust them to last in such an important application. Are you sure you need them?
Comment
-
I used a simple beading tool. One of these I think: https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/pr...sp?RecID=31585
Comment
-
I will probably connect mine directly with a strain relief S-curve. Has plenty of flexibility. Don't see a problem forgoing a flexible hose. Open to feedback.
0DFBD180-080D-485A-8106-6F33BC32D4DE_1_105_c.jpgLast edited by noema; 02-10-2025, 05:10 PM.Bearhawk "XHawk" Patrol, O-360, Trailblazer 80", tubeless 26" Goodyears, Stewart Systems. See XHawk Build Log.
Comment
-
While we are talking about sight gauges, what would you do if one failed and started leaking in flight?
I know it’s a simple system, and anything extra is just another point of possible failure, but what about putting some sort of shutoff valve at the tank fitting?
Comment
-
I put a restrictor in the fittings where the sight gauges come through the wing root into the cabin. I made my gauges out of clear PVC with 90° AN fittings. I drilled the center of a grub screw out to 0.040", tapped the AN fitting for the grub screw thread, and tightened the grub screw into one end of the fitting.
If the PVC gauge fails, the flow would be restricted to what can make it through a 0.040" hole. There would still be gas in the cabin but a lot less than full flow through an AN4 tube. I'm not really worried about a catastrophic failure of the sight gauge though. If it fails it'll probably start leaking slowly before it completely comes apart. I tested mine to more than double the pressure they'd ever see in use and there was no leakage around the threads in the pvc.
As a bonus, the restrictor dampens the movement of the fuel in the gauge which makes the gauge more useful in flight.4-Place QB kit #111. First flight May 2022.
IO-470 - 260hp
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by jaredyates View PostI did not use any rubber lines in the fuel system between the tanks and the firewall. I didn't trust them to last in such an important application. Are you sure you need them?
Comment
-
The type of clamp make a big difference as well. The smaller the tube, the more critical this gets. Constant tension (spring) work well if you can get a good fit, which can be tough the smaller the lines get. Crimped also work well, but you can't tighten them if they leak. For smaller lines my favorite are this type. Searching "fuel line clamps" will find them.
I also use two clamps per connection. Gravity fed fuel over my head scares me a bit.
clamps.png
Comment
-
I won't disagree that some/all of the above solutions are good ones. At the same time, I don't think that rubber hose based connections are inherently bad. Many certified airplanes uses short sections of rubber hose at the wing root and fuselage connection and these aircraft don't routinely fall out of the sky in flames. The main weakness of a hose connection is that it has a finite lifetime and will need to be tracked and replaced at some interval. I general I think we should be cautious when 'improving' on standard designs and techniques, especially if, like me, you don't have decades of knowledge and experience. Often my improvements end up being heavier, more complicated and possibly less reliable than what's suggested in the build manual or is a traditional solution. I'm learning (slowly I admit) to look more carefully at the trade-offs of different approaches.
Comment
Comment